Re: Security question -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Security question
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:48:39 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Don, you're not really a "you catch more flies with honey than you do with
vinegar" kind of guy, are you?

IBM 'is' intrinsically involved. They are active in this list and
elsewhere.

That being said, Chuck is right; I was just shortcutting. There are
numerous ways to suggest enhancements to both product and documentation.
Doing the official channel method helps IBM to actually log that someone
requested something. This may display interest. And if this helps some
of these wonderful IBMers to remain busy and keep their jobs I'm all for
that.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.