Yes indeed Vern - it is a wondrous thing to behold! I’m actually surprised it didn’t blow up trying to build it.

This CTE is HUGE and (for reasons I won’t get into) part of its function is to de-normalize the source tables using case statements to generate sets of 3 x 32 columns from 32 rows of 3 rows.

Not pretty.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On May 12, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Visual Explain might be very interesting - wonder if Jon used that yet?

On 5/12/2016 2:56 PM, Carel wrote:
I do not know if this add to the solution.

I once had a strange result with a CTE

WITH tmp AS( SELECT ...

I changed it to

WITH tmp(fieldA, fieldB, ...) AS (SELECT ...

it worked as it should be.

Perhaps that may be a solution (depending the number of columns in the result set).

Regards,

Carel Teijgeler

Op 12-5-2016 om 18:39 schreef Jon Paris:
No.

If we use the base table that uniqueId originates from we get the same results from both WHERE clauses as we should.

As I noted earlier we have identified a PTF that may be an answer but we’re not convinced it will help because the same problem exists at V7.1 and that PTF does not have a V7.1 equivalent.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On May 12, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does the behavior manifest on a very simple version?

with mycte as (select * from mytble)
select * from mtcte
where key <...>

What PTF levels?



On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Trust me Charles there is no typo - no room for one really if you think
about it. Simply changing the where clause at the end of a VERY large CTE
changes the result. Multiple people have looked at this and watched the
change being made in the interests of convincing ourselves of our sanity.

As
Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On May 12, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Jon,

Probably need to see the actual code...guessing some sort of typo.

A quick test of your paraphase code on my system returns the same single
row results.

Charles



On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

OK SQL gurus - need your help here. I’m pretty sure this has to be an
SQL
bug but if so I’d have expected it to have been reported before now and
I
can’t find anything on IBM’s site that sounds similar.

Have a large complex CTE which produces a weird result if I use = in the
WHERE compared with BETWEEN.

For example SELECT * from MyCTE where UniqueId between 50 and 50
produces
the expected single row result with all columns correctly populated.

On the other hand SELECT * from MyCTE where UniqueId = 50 also produces
a
single row but all columns are empty/null. Needless to say the results
should be identical.

Originally this was run on a 6.1 system so it was moved to a pretty
current 7.1 box with identical results.


Anyone seen this or anything like it?


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.