There is a full join way down in the bowels of one of the views that are incorporated into the CTE so I guess it is possible. Since we have our own workaround (which was only being used in testing) we won’t attempt to apply your option. We are in the process of extricating the required tables and reporting this to IBM.

Thanks.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On May 16, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Hiebert, Chris <chris.hiebert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jon,

Are you using a FULL join in your CTEs?

We opened a PMR with IBM last year to address a Full Join issue with SQL on V7R1.

IBM told us they won't fix the issue until at least V7R3.

We were able to work around the issue in our CTE by including an extra unused column from the "left" table of a Full Join.

Chris Hiebert
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.