RE: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports

Excellent! I was not sure if that would work with the original volume removed. Nice work

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Berendt
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:12 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports

I forgot an option on the report
STRRCYBRM USEDUPMED(*YES)
That fixed it.


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 08/23/2016 03:00 PM
Subject: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Migrating tape media from LTO4.
Did a DUPMEDBRM of our last system save (June) to LTO5. It's a
multivolume set.
WRKMEDBRM shows the new dup
Volume Creation Expiration Move Media Dup
Serial Status Date Date Location Date Class Sts
G00009 + *ACT 06/11/16 05/28/17 GRRTVTL *NONE ULTRIUM5 *
G00010 + *ACT 06/11/16 05/28/17 GRRTVTL *NONE ULTRIUM5 *
G00012 + *ACT 06/12/16 05/28/17 GRRTVTL *NONE ULTRIUM5 *

6=Work with serial set
shows these tapes.

Deleted the LTO4 volumes.


Go to print the recovery reports and I get:

Summary report:
Recovery Volume Summary Report

Detailed report:
----- Attention ---------------------------------------------------
The Licensed Internal Code has not been saved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Each section kind of has the same thing.

This isn't helping my SOX audit...

Rob Berendt