Re: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:24:23 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Oh, and when you use DUPMEDBRM you might want to add SAVMEDINF(*OBJ) on
your DUPMEDBRM. The default is *NO and that won't do an additional save
of the BRMS data library at the end of the save to ease your recovery.
IOW, it won't know about this new tape and will try to recover only from
media prior to your DUPMEDBRM. That was a nice little side tidbit to
learn by opening this ticket.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: DUPMEDBRM vs recovery reports , Jeff Crosby

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.