Re: Database I/O Modernization -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Database I/O Modernization
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:19:58 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Matt Olson <Matt.Olson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

This has been analyzed in depth over 11 years ago, by non other than IBM
themselves.

That whitepaper of Dan Cruikshank was heavily bias in favor of selling
consulting services. He conflates DDL with SQL even though it makes more
sense to view them separately. History has shown that DDL does not improve
performance. And Dan didn't cover SQL vs. RLA performance in that
whitepaper.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Database I/O Modernization , Matt Olson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.