RE: Database I/O Modernization

So your saying this article is also wrong? http://ibmsystemsmag.com/ibmi/developer/modernization/dbmodernization_part2/

What history are you referring to that refutes the performance benefits of 64K page sizes?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Andelin [mailto:nandelin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:20 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Database I/O Modernization

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Matt Olson <Matt.Olson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

This has been analyzed in depth over 11 years ago, by non other than
IBM themselves.

That whitepaper of Dan Cruikshank was heavily bias in favor of selling consulting services. He conflates DDL with SQL even though it makes more sense to view them separately. History has shown that DDL does not improve performance. And Dan didn't cover SQL vs. RLA performance in that whitepaper.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD