IBM's initial response is that the IBMi is NOT VULNERABLE to this style
padding attack.


That may be true. IBM's implementation may not be vulnerable. But I don't
see that stopping the security watch dogs from barking an otherwise making
a nuisance. A pity when you get a bad rap from your customers or your
competition claiming that your web interfaces are vulnerable.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.