RE: qsh from cl -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: qsh from cl
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:18:37 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

RDi does indent control blocks in CLLE.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Yeung [mailto:gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 9:43 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qsh from cl

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"What I want is indentation by logical level, like any sane programmer would indent in any sane language."

That sound vague and subjective to me.

Well, I would hope that we can all agree that the statements enclosed by DO..ENDDO ought to be indented at one level greater than the statement which contains the initial DO, and that nested blocks are indented further to the right than outer blocks.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: qsh from cl , John Yeung

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.