Re: Procedure Binding in CL -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Procedure Binding in CL
From: dlclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:07 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 03/15/2018
01:46:35 PM:

You source be able to put the target CLLE module into a *SRVPGM and call

from both places...

Yes, another "hoop" I had in mind. And, yes, we can build service
programs from multiple modules if we want to.

Sincerely,

Dave Clark

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Procedure Binding in CL , Mark Murphy

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.