Pointing the finger of fault isn't going to help since
the decisions could have been by people long gone, or even with prior owners.
Upgrading software isn't an option as vendors could be long gone as well.
Replacement might seem an (expensive) possibility but replacing
software that is used simply to maintain archive applications is unlikely.
Current owners/operators trying to do their due diligence are left with
only crazy expensive futures that are just a roll of the dice on whether the hardware will survive.

Best Regards,


On 11/1/2018 12:14 PM, Rob Berendt wrote:
"Can't" is an invalid word.

Just using your example, these people COULD have paid for maintenance.
But, no, they didn't want to. So now they blame the results of their poor
decision on the software vendor.
They have options.
Upgrade the vendor package, at a premium price.
Replace the vendor package.
Sell their business to someone who knows more, they've milked the cash cow
dry. And hope they pass the due diligence portion of it.



Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.