|
Scott is correct. We have equipment that may not be online all the--
time and in this instance, the program is waiting for the response.
At this point the "default" timeout is somewhere in the regions of 3
to 5 minutes before dropping back to my code. I am working to reduce
this to 3 seconds, today.
This is a major issue here as we have between 5 and 100 devices and
for those not responding, it delays the entire process as its a single
threaded process. 20 devices being offline results in a delay of 60 minutes.
TIA
Darryl
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:26 PM Scott Klement
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Alan,
I'd like to reply to some of the things in your message, I'll put my
comments inline.
The hanging thing is a new one. Are other people using this socketserver?
It doesn't sound like the socket server is not responding, itlike
sounds
you are connecting and then being hung up.
"Socket" is a set of routines that can be used for many different
things... I assume this example is TCP?
It is an extremely frequent issue with TCP that they "hang" when a
firewall is blocking the connection, or when the network connection
gets broken, etc. TCP is meant to be completely reliable, so the
receiving side will send acknowledgements of the data received, and
the sender will re-send anything that wasn't acknowledged, basically
it'll get stuck re-sending indefinitely if it gets no response.
For that reason, you should always implement a time out mechanism in
a TCP application.
Normally socket attempts to make a connection. That connection isan
either accepted or rejected. If there is nothing to connect to it
just returns
error.
...but that error can only be received if the network connection is
open and working. If something is blocking it (a firewall, or
something like an unplugged cable, power turned off, etc... anything
that would prevent the error message being sent back) instead of an
error, you'll sit and wait indefinitely.
If by "socket server" (hate that term) you don't mean a TCP server
but you mean something else, then my comments above may not apply.
It'd help me out a lot if you'd be more specific rather than using
terms like "socket server" or "socket client". Say TCP if you mean
TCP. If you can be even more specific (like Telnet, FTP, HTTP, SMTP,
PPTP, etc) then please do.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our
affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.