Re: Use of QGPL library for custom objects -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Use of QGPL library for custom objects
From: Evan Harris <auctionitis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:56:32 +1200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The first step on the road to "GPL Sprawl"...

(But I absolutely agree with your advice)

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:15 AM Jerry Draper <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Strongly recommend not putting any non-IBM objects into QGPL.

There was a day when the "General Purpose" library was good for whatever
from whoever.

Later IBM started putting version specific objects into QGPL.

Best to leave it alone and make your own HCGPL library for your business.

Jerry

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.