RE: i Access for Windows sound

The only missing feature for me is auto-refresh. All other features are handled by iACS or IBM Navigator for i. The reason I'll continue to use iNav until I can no longer keep it working is speed. On our 720, Nav for i was virtually unusable, and the workload on our 720 was miniscule. On our 914, with an even lower relative workload, Nav for i is usable but an order of magnitude slower than iNav. Everything in iACS rather than Nav for i is great.

I'll stop beating this dead horse now.



-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 8:03 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: i Access for Windows sound

I too missed some of the functions of System i Navigator in iAccess for Windows. However I now have a tough time remembering what it is I miss. The first thought which comes to mind is the PTF Compare utility between systems. But the printer capability, IFS capability and more I find far superior in iACS.

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com


shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com