Re: traditional AS/400 code base CMS transition -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: traditional AS/400 code base CMS transition
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:40:50 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 15.01.2020 um 17:22 schrieb John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>:

Honestly, there isn't such a thing as "traditional IBMi source
control"[1], except as PART OF change management.

Maybe the project related functions of PDM could be counted as "traditional"? I never had a deeper look into them. Seems to generate serious overhead with small programs.

Which functions do you mean?

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: traditional AS/400 code base CMS transition , Patrik Schindler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.