On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 6:39 AM Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I do not think it defeats the purposes. Again it is for those vendors who
choose to use it.
If you're perfectly happy charging your customer for both their primary
machine and their backup machine and they have limitless pockets and are
willing to pay it then continue to do so.


Is that what you think I do? Or is "you're" just a general?


However some of the software companies are charging exorbitant prices then
add on charges based on model, then add on charges for lpars it's not even
running on then... Some of these we don't even load on the backup box and
we'll just do without when running on that box.


Glad I don't do any of that. :)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.