Re: Memory used by *MACHINE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Memory used by *MACHINE
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:08:04 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Rob,

Am 08.08.2022 um 22:13 schrieb Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>:

Why are we losing 1%/week to temporary storage?
What, if anything, can be done about that?

1% of what? Complete allocated storage for that particular LPAR? Or free storage of that LPAR?

AFAIK, in earlier times, the well-accepted solution was to regularly re-IPL to reliably recover temporary space. Considering your habit of always staying current with OS releases and PTFs, a re-IPL might happen often enough so it might not become a threat.

Since Domino is involved, I think you might consider contacting IBM about your issue.

Probably not the answer you hoped for but the best I can help with.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Memory used by *MACHINE , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.