Re: IFS ownership

It's called SELinux and it's there on RedHat and Fedora and others.
The reason we don't have SELinux in the IFS is that we do our authorities in the licensed code.
That said, a lot of what I've seen in the field in terms of handling IFS security is a mishmosh of antipatterns.
99% of the time (he pulls number out of thin air or something darker) Unix-style security is sufficient.

________________________________
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Buzz Fenner via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 11:07
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Buzz Fenner <bfenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IFS ownership

________________________________
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:02:17, Rob Berendt wrote:

I was hoping for an IFS version of
CHGLIB LIB(MYLIB) CRTAUT(MYAUTL)

I wish...

All hail the new UNIX overlords.

--Buzz


Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.



Jack Woehr
Independent Consulting Programmer

303-847-8442

jack.woehr@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.procern.com

Stay Connected!

Not Just MSP, We Also MSSP.

 NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE: This communication including any and all attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further distribution or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy all copies of this communication immediately.