<snip>
>Also since WinDOHS is so adverse to
>JAVA, you don't know what Redmond will do to you.

You aren't actually implying that MS would release something that
intentionally disabled/disrupted Java, are you? Maybe I'm a little too
pro-MS, but that's a rather far out conspiracy idea.
</snip>

No, not intentionally, they would never live that down and the courts have
already ruled on that point.  My point is, however poorly stated, is that
Microsoft likes to try and set standards that benefit them, and put down
competition.  Many of the so called standards that Microsoft comes up with
conflict with where industry is headed and directly conflict with
competitors.  There is also a war between .Net (or 2003 if you prefer) and
Java right now.  Personally I think if Microsoft would just develop its
product, which is in some ways very superior to Java, and worry more about
quality than trying to control/corner the market, they will get their fair
share of the server marketplace.  Microsoft is not happy with building a
better product, they want to destroy anything that may give them real
competition.

Jim Oberholtzer


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.