<snip>
Interesting article indeed. The thing that hit me most was:

>... [BSA] conducted a raid and subsequent audit ... that turned up
>a few dozen unlicensed copies of programs.

And

>"We won't do business with someone who treats us poorly."

Now, when you are using unlicensed copies of software who is treating who
unfairly?

-Walden
</snip>

OK, Walden I can see you're point, however what you did not mention in the
article was Ball's point that if the BSA had come in and asked for a
voluntary audit, and worked with the company, instead of using the Gestapo
jack boot up front, they would have gotten the fees that were due, and most
likely kept a customer.  Remember we are talking about 8 (eight) copies,
not 1000s.  A little common sense would be nice with these fellas.    We
had a company in Wisconsin that was treated the same way as Ball, and beat
the audit 100%.  BSA did not have to pay back this company for the money
they spent to defend themselves. (almost 20% of the gross profit for the
year)   Why is that?

Jim Oberholtzer


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.