What I don't understand is why MS doesn't step up to the plate and create a JVM
for the Windows platform and tweak the heck out of it and claim that their OSs
are the best/fastest to use when running Java apps.  IBM did it with the JVM for
the iSeries and their other OSs.  Why would MS want to risk losing OS sales to
competitors just because they won't include a JVM.

-- Scott Johnson


> No argument. MS should't have mucked with the JVM the way
> they did. But
> that's not to say they no longer support Java, or that they
> are now working
> to make Java break. Sun said "what you've done is against the
> license" and
> MS (after arguing) said "ok, we'll stop"


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.