Re: Basic ??? question?

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Roger Vicker wrote:
>    3. Re: Basic ??? question? (Roger Vicker, CCP)
>
> The justification I remember (?) for the multiple keys and the index was
> so you could configure an access point with four keys. Give up to four
> different groups of people/devices one key each and specify the the
> matching index and then only change individual groups as needed.
> Example: assign key #1 to your wireless printers, key #2 to your
> notebook users and give key #3 to guests. Then when the guests leave
> change only key #3 and not have to go around and change all the printers
> and notebooks.

It seems that there's confusion over this. (I'm confused as much as 
anyone.) It _looks_ as if you're describing a kind of "unicast key" 
mechanism used by RADIUS servers. But I _think_ that the OP was writing 
about WEP "key refresh" keyindexes.

I don't know if those are directly related. I had a kind of
understanding of WEP keyindexes as providing a rotating set of keys
rather than subsets of keys for separate groups. I've seen no references 
that indicate that groups were related for WEP keys.

Of course, for me, being out in a forest setting and using wireless only 
so I can have convenience around my house, I'm not worried enough to 
bother digging into details. I easily could've missed something.

That doesn't mean I'm not interested in learning though.

Tom Liotta