Re: Network Database Replacement -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: Network Database Replacement
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:32:54 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm not a fan of hosting data not created by a PC-based program on the

400. That's what PC's and servers do much better/quicker

Huh? OK, if you mean file-system documents like .doc and .xls I'll agree
completely, let the DB servers be DB servers and the file servers be
file servers. But I think you _are_ talking about rows and columns, so I
would think you would want it on the iSeries. You have an
industrial-strength database, and more importantly, you'd know that the
data was being backed-up, and you know how to restore it. JMTCW.

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.