Re: Network Database Replacement -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: Network Database Replacement
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:41:42 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joel Cochran wrote:

True enough, but when I hear SqlServer I still think of the standard
version. On a similar note, if you really want to you can pay for MySQL.
Isn't there also a free version of Oracle?

Why use a those databases when you already have a rock solid database
that you know how to manage already?

DB2/400 is your friend.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Network Database Replacement , Joel Cochran

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.