Re: L2 cache size? -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: L2 cache size?
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:16:16 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

John Jones wrote:

Now, some workloads are sensitive to cache. Java, for instance, runs better
on machines with larger caches.

As it happens, I tend to do a lot of java work on my laptop ... so I'm going to change the order to the larger cache.

Thanks!

david

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.