• Subject: Re: "extract" command enhancement
  • From: John P Carr <jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:33:59 -0400

Jon Said;
>Not wild about that one Hans - for one thing I don't think I'd ever be able
to
>remember it <bg>.  It's just too arcane. One of the things I was trying to
>suggest with %Part - %Segment - %Subfld - %Item was that the portion
extracted
>depended on the *D or whatever that was coded - I don't see that the BIF
needs
t>o have a strong association with date/time/timestamp per se.  Who knows -
there
>may be other things we want to extract components from in future - why tie
it to
>DTZ

Jon,   You not looking down the road and thinking that some "Generic" like
BIF
could manipulate, or "Play with"     Java type thingys are you ??

John Carr
EdgeTech



+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.