|
Hans, What are the chances of getting bitwise operators as *both* infix and bifs? Regards, Jim Langston boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote: > <SNIP> > > I think I'd prefer infix operators too. But by my informal > count, BIF supporters outnumber us by about 2 to 1. BIF's can > certainly be defined to handle ANDing or ORing multiple values > at once, since the BIFs could be defined to take any number of > operands. > > Cheers! Hans > > Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.