RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL
From: "Jim Langston" <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:43:16 -0700
Importance: Normal
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I believe that is only an issue with commitment control enabled, but am not
positive.

If that is an issue, I think it would be the same with both the CHAIN and
SETLL opcodes, no?

Regards,

Jim Langston
Programmer/Analyst
Cels Enterprises, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Alan Addison
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:36 AM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL


Is there not the caveat to this that records added by other programs since
the file was opened may or may not show up in the resulting operation?   I
seem to remember this bu am not sure about it.

Alan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.