--

> >Methinks, this is a bug: if you use a resulting indicator, the syntax
> >checker should check wheter  the right column is filled, or not. Leaving
> >out any indicator assumes you are going to use the (right) BIF.
>
>Carel, it's a feature.  All the indicators are now optional (as of V4R2)
>for the I/O operations.  The syntax checker will give an error if you put
>an indicator where none is allowed, but if more than one is allowed,
>you're free to code any or all of them.
>
>Barbara Morris

Barbara,

In RPG III the syntax checker will signal an error if you do not fill in an
indicator in the correct position, in RPG IV only if you put it in the
wrong position. This change should be reversed, as a lot of diehards use
indicators on a read/chain operation. Besides, one should keep backward
compatibility in mind.

Just my opinion.

Regards,
Carel Teijgeler.
--




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.