>> well, just for the sake of being argumentative and the advancement of
technical knowledge, if you translate from w-code up to C

IBM chose to go the Java route to achieve this end.  C is not that portable
when you take all the run time requirements into account.  With Java the
toolbox classes already existed to provide the CHAIN/READ/etc. capability.

So - they did exactly what you suggest - they just didn't chose to use C.

Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com



This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.