>> well, just for the sake of being argumentative and the advancement of
technical knowledge, if you translate from w-code up to C

IBM chose to go the Java route to achieve this end.  C is not that portable
when you take all the run time requirements into account.  With Java the
toolbox classes already existed to provide the CHAIN/READ/etc. capability.

So - they did exactly what you suggest - they just didn't chose to use C.

Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.