RE: Bug in IBM Date Routies %month -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Bug in IBM Date Routies %month
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:13:39 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

They did with the SQL option someone posted.
The thought of putting imbedded SQL in your code go against your stubborn 
streak?  Then put the sql into a service program and export the 
subprocedure and you've got a new bif.
If you still want the bif, then submit a DCR to emulate the sql function. 
You can submit a dcr at
https://www-912.ibm.com/r_dir/ReqDesChange.nsf/Request_for_Design_Change?OpenForm

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Function searching, was: Bug in IBM Date Routies %month , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.