There was a long thread on this a few months back you may want to check.
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Keller
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:22 AM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Source Naming conventions
Hello. I'm curious as to how people name their rpg source members. I'm
coming into a new shop where everything is pretty much open to however I
want it to be. We currently use 2 packages for most of our production
processing and most of my code and the existing code are interfaces into
one or both of these systems. I can break the systems down into 2 digit
codes AA and BB we'll say for now. Should I make all my programs fall
under one of these categories? AA0001, AA0002, BB0001, etc... I have
some code that interfaces with AA, but could be subcategorized as EDI.
I could name these EDI0001 or AAEDI0001. Also some Physical Inventory
programs. PI0001? AAPI0001.
I guess I'm asking for thoughts and opinions on this. What do you use
for your naming conventions? What works and what doesn't work?
Thanks! Mark
midrange.com
