Re: ILE --OPM -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: ILE --OPM
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:44:41 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=D1980033; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/

Vernon Hamberg wrote:

I think your mileage will vary, but it's generally a good idea to
move to ILE, even with CL. I read some estimate once, think it was
either 20% improvement or 20% of the runtime.

Replying in MIDRANGE-L on the topic of OPM CL vs. ILE CL.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.