RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group
From: J.Beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:50:52 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Well, each user 1 blink, probably.

What I mean is that these days systems have become so powerful, that many
of yesterdays performance considerations have become irrelevant. What IBM
said about ACTGRP(*NEW) was that the overhead it took was not as big as,
but in the same league as starting a new job, i.e. signing on. How long
does signing off en on again take on your system?

Joep

rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 26-03-2009 14:38:52:

RE: OPM called by program running in a named activation group

David FOXWELL

Joep,

If you had 100 users, wouldn't it take more like 100 blinks?

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.