SQL and reducing static storage -- RPG400-L

Subject: SQL and reducing static storage
From: darren@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:50:26 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I had the bright idea of using no static storage, except what was
absolutely required, by moving all structures to subprocedures. I found
that static storage (seen in DSPPGM) wasn't decreasing much for my effort,
so I looked at the compile listing. I found every field that I used as a
host variable for SQL, in the static storage definition area. Is there
anyway to make the SQL temporary variables local to the procedure using
them?

Follow-Ups:

Re: SQL and reducing static storage , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.