Re: Service programs and QSRVSRC

[Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

M. Lazarus wrote:
>   Isn't managing your own signature (almost) the equivalent of doing 
> LVLCHK(*NO)?  

Kind of, yes.  Except that there isn't anything similar to using 
LVLCHK(*YES).


> If you change the export sequence or add/delete one in 
> the middle, there's no protection from using an version, if you 
> forget to manually change the signature!

Okay...?  Are you saying that hard-coding the signature *without* a 
version solves this problem?  If so, how?!?!

Or...  are you saying that you know of an alternative that would catch 
the problem for you if you add/delete one in the middle?  If so, please 
expand on that.

To read more about my position on the subject, please see the following 
article (this is the same article Matt Lavinder posted the link to 
earlier in this thread)
http://systeminetwork.com/article/binder-language-and-signature-debate