|
M. Lazarus wrote:
> I don't think that many people like the way that service program
> signatures have been implemented, but specifying your own removes
> what little protection it does give. It's way too easy to overlook
> changing the signature when a service program is regenerated.
Why aren't you answering my question? WHAT protection does the system
provide you? HOW are you recommending that I code my SRVPGM that will
solve this problem?
Are you suggesting using STRPGMEXP PGMLVL(*CURRENT) with no *PRV blocks?
Is that the method you recommend? Or what method do you recommend?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.