Hard-coding File names in calcs reduces flexibility.
So later if I want to change Logical LF1 to LF101 with different
selection later, I do not have to change the calcs too.

That being the case, why are you bothering with <F>ile specifications?
Wouldn't you be (much) better off with SQL, and have then only one place to
change (or none, if you let the system be smart about index selection)?

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
Here's an idea: Limit politicians to two terms:
One in office
One in prison




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.