Yes, I also have a copybook which is copied directly into the source which
includes a sendMsg *subroutine* precisely for this purpose. Again, not
ideal, but it works well in cases where I easily want to know what routine
sent the message..

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

I think your point is that because the call QMHSNDPM is inside a
procedure it will be that procedure name that will appear on the F9
details so even though the module and program may be what is desired,
in a multi-procedure program you'll lose the real sender information
anyway. That's a valid point and the only solution to that is to call
the message API directly from the function that needs to send the
message.


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.