Re: MAIN and LR -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: MAIN and LR
From: Dave <dfx1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:56:59 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

2012/9/26 Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>:

For me, the most compelling reason to use a linear
main is that all your RPG procedures look the same, except that one of
them is designated as the first procedure to be called when the program
is called.

I didn't buy that, as I think programmers identify the main procedure
as the one that has no interface and therefore containing the first
executable code.

The other big benefit is that a linear main procedure can be called
recursively.

That's more interesting to me, so programs CAN be called recursively?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: MAIN and LR , James Lampert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.