Re: Free form PSDS *PROC -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Free form PSDS *PROC
From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:09:36 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Barbara

I am with you on qualified DS' - I much prefer that, too.

Vern

On 12/19/2013 1:12 PM, Barbara Morris wrote:

On 12/18/2013 10:21 PM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:

Is *N a valid option for the name - I mean, who among us ever uses the
name of the PSDS, anyhow? I only use the subfields.

Hi Vern, yes, *N is fine. Me, I usually use a qualified data structure
for my PSDS these days. But if I didn't want it to be qualified, I'd use
*N too.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.