|
Am 23.04.2025 um 19:04 schrieb Marco Facchinetti <marco.facchinetti@xxxxxxxxx>:
I'm sorry but IBM made the right decision in letting go of the customer who wants to have a solution based only on the old paradigm of a programmer an application (Rpg + 5250).
Today, and in truth for many years, the market asks that the interface can be chosen by the customer based on needs and not on IBM's prepackaged ideas (Visual Age and EGL).
Whoever does not accept this paradigm is out of the market and IBM is right not to indulge them.
Please take a deep look at IWS. It's free and works great.
Am 23.04.2025 um 19:42 schrieb Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx>:
IMO, IBM was trying to provide options, but the vast majority of customers refused to budge from 5250.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.