Re: IBM i 7.6 Development tools -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: IBM i 7.6 Development tools
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 23:59:17 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Raul,

Am 23.04.2025 um 23:24 schrieb Raul Alberto Jager Weiler <raul.jager@xxxxxxxxx>:

I believe that separate the web server from the IBM i makes it easier for
the hackers to cause trouble.
If the web server gets compromised it becomes an easy path to the IBM i,
while the Apache running in the i is very hard to break.

Yes, you name it. You believe. Why should Apache on platform a being easier or harder to break than on platform b? Makes no sense. The outcome is the same for both approaches. When the attacker gains a shell it's game over. No matter if Linux or PASE.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: IBM i 7.6 Development tools , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.