To be under Indicators or not to be

["Voris, John" <john.voris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Mike Kohlndorfer . . . . .

> I would prefer named indicators be listed as fields, 
> while system reserved indicators (*INxx, LR, etc) stay under
indicators.   
> A named indicator does not jump out as an indicator unless you spend
time analyzing how it is used;  system indicators are more obvious.
> If listed as a field, the data type is shown to the right, making it
easier to recognize


( And when maintaining a program, I may need to change the binary
indicator into a code that now could hold three values. )

- John V.