RE: [WEB400] dumb question about environment record length

["Mark A. Manske" <mmanske@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually it is the environment record that I am reading in that bit me.
But this makes sense that the limits where for the old OS.
Thanks for giving me a "warm fuzzy" to move on.

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-admin@midrange.com [mailto:web400-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Brad Stone
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:37 AM
To: web400@midrange.com
Subject: Re: [WEB400] dumb question about environment record length


Yes, Bob.  I should have been more clear.. sorry.  Thanks
for clearing that up.

Brad

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 07:50:43 -0600
 "Bob Cozzi \(RPGIV\)" <cozzi@rpgiv.com> wrote:
> Wasn't that old limit for each call to Stdout? Not a
> limit of stdout
> itself. So you could call the stdout routine 25 times to
> send it 25k of
> data.
>
> Bob Cozzi
> cozzi@rpgiv.com
> Visit the new on-line iSeries Forums at:
> http://www.rpgiv.com/forum
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: web400-admin@midrange.com
> [mailto:web400-admin@midrange.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of Brad Stone
> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:20 PM
> > To: web400@midrange.com
> > Subject: Re: [WEB400] dumb question about environment
> record length
> >
> > I assume you mean things like the size of the string to
> > write out to StdOut?  If so, the reason most examples
> show
> > 1024 is because that was the limit in V3R2.  These days
> you
> > can make it as big as you want.
> >
> > Brad
> > www.bvstools.com