|
> From: "Joe Pluta": > how do you explain the two different documents, one in 1998 > saying (according to you) that QTMHCGI is dead, while another > released in 2000 says to use it? Oh my aching head. The last publication I read that said to use QTMHCGI was "Cool Title About the AS/400 and Internet", published in 1996. But I confirmed your Web references. Sounds like IBM got their wires crossed. Or, maybe it's an indication of the amount of effort that they want to put into CGI. Whatever the reason, I'd agree that it's not customer centric. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
