Re: What happened to rpgenerationx.com? -- WEB400

Brad,

On one hand I'd encourage you to run your tests again.  During your test, I
may have been running a stress test of my own which overloaded my 128 kb
router.

On the other hand, I really think you need to try it from JMeter or
something like it to get comparable results.  It sounds like your test may
have overloaded my CPU and my network.

Do you want to test the performance of my CPU and my network (which are
quite limited), or the performance of the software running on it?

If you were running your tests from the Netshare system, your results may
have been skewed by an overloaded system on your side.  Do you want to test
your system or mine?  Use a dedicated Pentium and software with thread based
design, and you'll be stress testing my applications, not yours.

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com



> From: "Brad Stone" <brad@bvstools.com>
> I disagree.  If when I was surfing I could strip out the
> time that it took to connect that would be great.  I've used
> JMeter and I think it "cheats".  I wrote a Java version of
> my tool using threads (instead of jobs) and got almost
> identical results.

> Mine measures from request to completion.  That's how
> requests work in the real world.  I've used my tool to load
> test many servers, and even the pbA server.  And using it
> before and after loading PTFs that help it's CGI performance
> it was shown to work.
>
> Anyhow, you shouldn't be worried if I show 3 seconds for a
> hit, and you show 800 milleseconds.  You should be worried
> about the percentage of difference between 1 request and 10
> requests.  Not the actual time.
>
> I'm making the requests from a 170 with 1 gig memory and
> average load.  It's also a web server for a LOT of web
> sites.  10 users shouldn't make much of a dent unless you
> have less than 512k memory, full DASD, 2 arms, etc.
>
> Brad
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:19:11 -0600
>  "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM> wrote:
> > Brad,
> >
> > Just so we're comparing apples to apples, I have another
> > suggestion.
> > Download a copy of the JMeter stress test tool from
> > www.apache.org to do the
> > test.  JMeter instantiates client Threads rather than
> > Jobs, and if I
> > understand correctly measures the time between the
> > request and the first
> > byte received in order to strip network time from the
> > equation.
> >
> > Also remember that you're hitting a model 170-2290.  It
> > doesn't take much to
> > drive the CPU utilization to the wall.  Ten users with no
> > delay will peg my
> > CPU at +++ utilization.  To be accurate, your tests need
> > to let my CPU
> > breath, as mine did.
> >
> > Nathan M. Andelin
> > www.relational-data.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
>