Re: [WEB400] What happened to rpgenerationx.com?

["Brad Stone" <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:34:58 -0600
 "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM> wrote:
> Brad,
>
> On one hand I'd encourage you to run your tests again.
> During your test, I
> may have been running a stress test of my own which
> overloaded my 128 kb
> router.
>
> On the other hand, I really think you need to try it from
> JMeter or
> something like it to get comparable results.  It sounds
> like your test may
> have overloaded my CPU and my network.

CPU plays a role, so does network.  But the results are
comperable to me hitting my own sites on the same machine.

>
> Do you want to test the performance of my CPU and my
> network (which are
> quite limited), or the performance of the software
> running on it?

Well, they all play a role.  128k isn't peanuts.  And the
data being returned isn't that much.

>
> If you were running your tests from the Netshare system,
> your results may
> have been skewed by an overloaded system on your side.

No, the system never was over 60% during the test.  I keep
an eye on that.

> Do you want to test
> your system or mine?  Use a dedicated Pentium and
> software with thread based
> design, and you'll be stress testing my applications, not
> yours.

But I don't believe JMeter tests the way a browser acts.
That's why I test the way I have it.  I've had very
consistant results even when doing 100 simultaneous hits.

I've even load tested my own Linux Apache server running on
a 56k dialup with excelent results... bandwith is rarely the
problem.

I'm not trying to prove your product doesn't work.  But, if
you're that worried about your CPU and network causing
problems, maybe you have a customer with a bigger box that
would allow me to test on instead.  I was under the
impression that your product saved CPU and resources as
compared to the HTTP servers.. so that should have some
affect.

Maybe I'll set up my PC to pound on your server for a while.
:)  We'll see.