Not sure of the differences.  I'd look up the API docs at
IBM.  Maybe that will help decipher the difference.

Brad

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:53:52 -0500
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@taylorcorp.com> wrote:
> I am finding that I need to write my own sub procedures
> to do the socket
> writes because they are conflicting with what I want to
> send.  I think that
> may be my problem. . .  Now that I know I should be able
> do multiple writes
> I will go forward with that.
>
> One other question.  What are the benefits to using
> send() and recv() vs.
> read() and write() to do my socket processing?  In Scott
> Klements tutorial
> he uses send() and recv() and in the GETURI tool Brad
> Stone uses read() and
> write().  Just wondering.
>
> Aaron Bartell
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Stone [mailto:brad@bvstools.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:30 AM
> To: web400@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: [WEB400] HTTP Headers



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.