Re: XML vs. Name Value pair was ->RE: [WEB400] XML and RPG-CGI, is X ML needed. was -> HolyWar . . ..

["Brad Stone" <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:44:18 -0500 
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I knew you would pipe in!  :-)
> 
> Very valid question and I dislike the extra data as much
> as the next guy,
> but to make my point more valid let me give you an
> example where I thought
> XML would be better than a POST with name value pairs.
>  Tell me how you
> would put this into name value pairs -
> http://mowyourlawn.com/temp/ValuePair.xml

Didn't look at it yet, but I guess you lost me here.  How
do you communicate the data through HTTP, using the correct
headers (like you mentioned you do) et al without using a
POST?  (If the answer is with a GET, Im not interested..
snicker)

See where I'm going with this?